Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Com

comparitive analysis between the deserter and the hero.

Similarities.
  • Although the two titles seem to differ, with one being a hero and one being a deserter really they are about the same circumstances. Both men in the poems were trying to escape the war. 
  • The mothers of the men are both misinformed and think their sons are hero's that died for their country.
  • The hero uses enjambement and so does the deserter.
Differences.
  •        The rhyming pattern in the hero is AA,BB,CC and in the deserter the rhyming pattern is A,B,C,B.
  • The soldier in the deserter was killed by his own country and the hero was killed by an opposing country.
Comments about the poems-
When in the Deserter the line ' an english bullet in his heart'  is repeated twice it adds emphasis and impact on the way the line makes you think. It adds a slight shock to the reader and maybe makes you feel guilty. It also shows that the war had no mercy , no life was spared and no mistake would be taken lightly.

Alice Collett,  Cleophie Alexander, Eleanor Izzard and Leanne Knights.blog party!

Comparison of Recruiting and The Target!!!!

  1. Recruiting is showing the public the truth behind the propaganda "Lads, you're wanted, go and help." The Target is very blunt and shows what can really happen on the front line.
  2. Both poems use guilt to emphasize their message.
  3. Both use caesuras and enjambments.
  4. In recruiting the second and fourth lines rhyme in every verse (ABCB) whereas the Target uses rhyming couplets.
  5. Recruiting is very literal and doesn't describe much emotion, however, the Target uses a lot of imagery and is visceral.
  6. Both tell that the soldiers will die no matter what happens. In the target the poet writes as a soldier who has just killed another man but did not have any choice because he did it to save himself.
  7. Both have a mixed number of syllables per verse, this shows that the poet hasn't focused on this.
  8. Recruiting is probably written about the poet's own experiences as he was an officer in WW1. Ivor Gurney was also a soldier in WW1 but a lesser one than E.A. Mackintosh and so is showing his own experiences and what he probably had to do.
  9. Ivor Gurney writes about the people left at home and all their worries about their relatives on the front line. E.A. Mackintosh however tells them to forget their other life and to learn to "Live and die with honest men."
  10. Both poems have four lines in each of their stanzas, which is the typical length for a poem.
Alexia, Katie, Laurie and Felicity.

Monday, 19 October 2009

Comparison of two poems by Wilfred Owen

This is a picture of Wilfred Owen, the poet. This picture demonstrates that he served in the war and died during service.
We are going to compare two poems by Wilfred Owen. One is from the book; The Send Off and the other we found on the internet; Disabled.

This is Disabled

He sat in a wheeled chair, waiting for dark,
And shivered in his ghastly suit of grey,
Legless, sewn short at elbow. Through the park
Voices of boys rang saddening like a hymn,
Voices of play and pleasure after day,
Till gathering sleep had mothered them from him.

About this time Town used to swing so gay
When glow-lamps budded in the light blue trees,
And girls glanced lovelier as the air grew dim, -
In the old times, before he threw away his knees.
Now he will never feel again how slim
Girls' waists are, or how warm their subtle hands;
All of them touch him like some queer disease.

There was an artist silly for his face,
For it was younger than his youth, last year.
Now, he is old; his back will never brace;
He's lost his colour very far from here,
Poured it down shell-holes till the veins ran dry,
And half his lifetime lapsed in the hot race
And leap of purple spurted from his thigh.

One time he liked a blood-smear down his leg,
After the matches, carried shoulder-high.
It was after football, when he'd drunk a peg,
He thought he'd better join. - He wonders why.
Someone had said he'd look a god in kilts,
That's why; and may be, too, to please his Meg;
Aye, that was it, to please the giddy jilts
He asked to join. He didn't have to beg;
Smiling they wrote his lie; aged nineteen years.
Germans he scarcely thought of; all their guilt,
And Austria's, did not move him. And no fears
Of Fear came yet. He thought of jewelled hilts
For daggers in plaid socks; of smart salutes;
And care of arms; and leave; and pay arrears;
Esprit de corps; and hints for young recruits.
And soon, he was drafted out with drums and cheers.

Some cheered him home, but not as crowds cheer Goal.
Only a solemn man who brought him fruits
Thanked him; and then inquired about his soul.

Now, he will spend a few sick years in institutes,
And do what things the rules consider wise,
And take whatever pity they may dole.
To-night he noticed how the women's eyes
Passed from him to the strong men that were whole.
How cold and late it is! Why don't they come
And put him into bed? Why don't they come?

This poem is about someone who has come home from the war and who is now disabled. It could be considered a sequel to The Send-Off because The Send-Off is about someone going into war, and Disabled is about someone coming back. Disabled may be referring to the people he saw around him when he was on sick leave from the war and The Send-Off may be referring to him going to the war.

In Disabled, Owen turns fear into a proper noun; "And no fears Of Fear came yet." This sentence means that the man in the poem didn't fear Fear yet. The use of personification turns fear into a concrete noun making it into someone and making it scarier. When it is a proper noun it seems to be more important, and as it is usually not capitalized the slight change is very noticeable and it makes you feel that you can't escape it. However, Owen does not use personification in The Send-Off and this shows how he can use different techniques for different effects and doesn't always have to fill his poems with every technique, but can use just a few and make them powerful.

When you read both poems you feel empathy for the people in it, but we think that we feel more empathy for the character in Disabled because of what he's gone through; "Legless, sewn short at elbow." This verse is very to the point and makes you realise what's happened. In The Send-Off you feel empathy for the women and children who are losing their loved ones because they are going to war. You also know that most of them won't come back so you feel for them more. When you read it you have the benefit of hindsight and you know what is going to happen to them when their loved ones don't come back.

The last stanza of The Send Off is contrasting to the previous stanza. While before it made it seem as though when the soldiers arrived home they would get a heroes welcome, the last paragraph contradicts this point. "May creep back, silent, to village wells, Up half-known roads" This shows the darker side, the real side of what happens when they eventually return home. The word half-known suggests that even though they may have spent most of their lives living there, the war had had made even the most important and memorable things in life seem distant and foreign.

from Ed Parry, Lucy Oliva, Georgie Bray and Ashley Layer group 3

Comparison of "The Hero" and "Spring in War - Time" ;)

For "The Hero" there are 10 syllables per line, however on line 7 it could be argued that it has 11 syllables as it depends on how you say it. This poem uses rhyming couplets apart from the 1st four lines of the second verse, which uses alternate rhyme - this shows a very clear middle section. This poem uses a lot of enjambement, practically every line is continued into the next. Due to this caesura is used to show the ending of each particular line.
The poem is seen from two perspectives, the worried mother who receives the news of her sons death and the Officer who delivers the telegram and also has to break the news to her. The poem is not necesssarily reccounted from her point of view, quite a lot of the poem is talking about her emotions, so her point of view is a big factor in the poem. It is quite a detailed, narrative poem and it uses speech etc which shows it in more of a story form. As this poem is very explanitary and detailed it lacks technicality.
eg: there are hardly any metaphors, similies or personification in the poem.
Abi Sears, Kate Millington, Tash Black, Hollie Rathbone and Katie Saddler (':


Comparative analysis of joining the colours and the send-off.

1.  Joining the colours uses an AB AB structure, and the send-off uses an ABA AB structure. These rhyming schemes make the poems flow.
2. Joining the Colours has 4 stanzas of 4 lines, with the 4th of each using only 3 words. The Send-Off has 8 stanzas of 3, and then 2 lines. 
3. both of these poems are about men going off to fight the war. Joining the colours is more about what these people will miss, and The Send-off is more about the soldiers getting on the train to France, to their deaths. 
4. the  author of Joining The Colours is Female, and The Send-off is written by Wilfred Owen, a soldier fighting in the war.
5. Both of the poems use enjamberment. An example from The Send Off is "They sang there way To thee siding shed."An example from Joining The Colours " row on row On high tram tops"
By using enjamberment the poets allows the poem to flow as you read it, it carries on the thought from the previous line. 


Dan, Nathan, Henry 

Comparison between Spring in War-Time and The Deserter

1. The most clear difference between these two poems is that The Deserter is written as one exceedingly long stanza, however Spring in War-Time is divided into four short stanza's.
2. Both poems have a rhyming pattern. Spring in War-Time uses alternate rhyming consistently throughout the poem but The Deserter has a less obvious rhyming structure, though there is still evidence of a pattern within.
3. One of the most obvious techniques used in The Deserter is repitition, used very regularly, though Spring in War-Time doe not use this approach, Nesbit uses ellipsis, which The Deserter lacks.
EVELYN, ALIX, Nor and Rachel